fix(desktop): reopen a chat on the browser tab the user left it on - #7793
Conversation
The resource strip pushed its own last-tab fallback onto the desktop app whenever a chat opened without an explicit selection, overriding the tab the desktop remembers the user was on. The shared desktop-tab hook now switches the native tab only for an explicit selection, adopts the desktop's active tab when the strip is on its fallback, and defers a selected tab that has not landed yet until it does. Chat hydration no longer writes a browser or terminal tab into the URL as a fallback.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. |
|
…lection Review round on the reopen fix. A late first report of the desktop app's active tab carries the tab it remembers, not a switch the user made, so it is adopted rather than claimed and agent activity can still take the view on chat open. A move away from a tab the desktop was already showing stays the user's own. Adoption now waits for the chat history to be applied, so the arrival order of the tab list and the history no longer decides which resource a chat opens on, and it skips a tab the strip has already dropped, so closing the shown tab cannot write the closed id back. Closing the shown tab selects its neighbour the way the desktop app picks the next native tab, instead of flashing through the strip's last tab. The two wrapper hooks now share one options type with the strip, and the adopt rule lives in a single helper. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0139YonWmiZUnPMTHoH4PtAJ
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
The effect that shows an explicitly selected tab was keyed on the selection alone, so a selection made before the desktop app published its tab list was dropped rather than applied when the tab arrived. It is now keyed on that tab being live as well, which covers the late arrival without a retry ref to arm and disarm. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0139YonWmiZUnPMTHoH4PtAJ
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
…store-on-chat-switch
…mbing Quality pass on the reopen fix. The late-arrival adoption now carries the same guards as the hydrated one, so a first report of the desktop app's active tab can no longer override a selection the user made before the tab list arrived. Both guards are pinned by tests that fail when either is removed. The predicate the adopt and claim paths share moved into one helper, so the single difference between them — adoption needs the tab to still be in the strip, following the user does not — is stated once. Removes a ref nothing read and an options interface with no second consumer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0139YonWmiZUnPMTHoH4PtAJ
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
The test hosts took their props through a type alias derived from the hook signature. The repo asks for an interface, and the hook already exports one that is exactly this shape, so the hosts use it directly instead of restating it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0139YonWmiZUnPMTHoH4PtAJ
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
Reopening a chat could show the wrong page for as long as the chat history took to load. The strip wrote the desktop app's remembered tab into the selection from an effect, and that write had to wait for the history or the arrival order would decide what the chat opened on. With the history held back 2.5s, an instrumented run showed the wrong page for 2164ms before it corrected. The rule is now a pure function: an explicit selection wins, otherwise the last resource, except that a desktop-backed last resource defers to the tab the desktop app is showing. Nothing is written back, so the gate, the passive setter and the effect behind them are gone, and the same run now shows the remembered page immediately. A native switch is claimed as the user's against the tab the desktop app was showing rather than the one the strip shows, since with no explicit selection those are now the same tab. Closing the shown tab prefers a neighbour of its own kind, so the strip and the desktop app agree on what comes next. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0139YonWmiZUnPMTHoH4PtAJ
…store-on-chat-switch
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
Summary
Why it is a pure rule rather than a write
An earlier revision adopted the remembered tab by writing it into the selection from an effect, gated on the chat history having loaded. An instrumented Electron run with the history held back 2.5s showed the strip on the wrong page for 2164ms before it corrected. Deriving the value instead removes the gate, the passive setter and the effect, and the same run now shows the remembered page immediately.
Testing
apps/simsuite: 3,543 files, 50,872 tests, zero failures. Type-check across all workspaces, lint, 46 audits, migration safety and docs manifest all pass.Known limits (unchanged by this PR)
Type of Change
Checklist
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_0139YonWmiZUnPMTHoH4PtAJ